Optical waveguide and optical fiber transmission system

ABSTRACT

In an optical waveguide having plural cores including a pair of adjacent cores with an identical core structure, a minimum value D of center-center distance between the adjacent cores is 15 μm to 60 μm, each of the plural cores has a bent portion fixed in a radius of curvature R b  of not more than 7 mm, a bend supplementary angle of the bent portion is 58° to 90°, a height of the optical waveguide is defined as a height of not more than 10 mm, and a crosstalk of the adjacent cores is not more than 0.01.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This is a continuation application of copending application Ser. No.14/730,461, having a filing date of Jun. 4, 2015, which is acontinuation application of PCT/JP2013/082384 claiming the benefit ofpriorities of the Japanese Patent Application No. 2012-266464 filed onDec. 5, 2012, the Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-173368 filed onAug. 23, 2013, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/733,527 filed onDec. 5, 2012, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein byreference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an optical waveguide and an opticalfiber transmission system, and specifically the optical waveguideincludes a multi-core optical fiber (hereinafter referred to as opticalfiber) and a multi-core optical waveguide (hereinafter simply referredto as optical waveguide).

Related Background Art

The optical fibers (MCFs) having plural cores extending along a fiberaxis in a common cladding part are expected as optical transmissionlines capable of transmitting large volumes of information.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is, however, known that the multi-core optical fibers have theproblem of degradation of signals due to inter-adjacent-core-crosstalk(hereinafter referred to as crosstalk) or the like. We discovered thatthe crosstalk increased contrary to the conventionally knowninformation, particularly, when the optical fibers were used with a bendin an extremely small radius of curvature.

The present invention has been accomplished in view of the abovecircumstances and it is an object of the present invention to provide anoptical fiber, an optical waveguide, and an optical fiber transmissionsystem in which the increase of crosstalk is suppressed even in use witha bend in a small radius of curvature.

In order to achieve the object, an optical waveguide according to afirst aspect comprises: plural cores including a pair of adjacent coreswith an identical core-structure; a cladding covering each of pluralcores; a first surface on which one ends of the plural cores aredisposed; and a second surface on which the other ends of the pluralcores are disposed, and the plural cores extend from the first surfaceto the second surface. In the optical waveguide, a minimum value D [μm]of center-to-center distance between the adjacent cores is a value inthe range of 15 μm to 60 μm, and the optical waveguide satisfies any onecondition of the following first to third conditions at a predeterminedwavelength within a predetermined wavelength band.

The first condition is defined by:

(a) an optical fiber (multi-core optical fiber) serving as the opticalwaveguide;

(b) a difference of α_(90deg) between cores having the identicalcore-structure, the difference being not more than 1 dB where the ofα_(90deg) is defined as a bending loss per 90° of a predetermined corewhile the optical fiber has a 90° bend in a predetermined radius ofcurvature R_(b) [mm] of not more than 4 mm;

(c) a virtual crosstalk (linear value) in a 10-km fiber length betweenthe adjacent cores at the center-to-center distance of the minimum valueD, the virtual crosstalk being not more than 0.01 where the opticalfiber has bend in a predetermined radius of curvature of 30 mm to 200cm; and

(d) the bending loss α_(90deg) of not more than a value represented byExpression (1) below where a measured crosstalk (linear value) in apredetermined fiber length of not more than 10 km is XT_(w/oB) and theoptical fiber has bend in a predetermined radius of curvature of 30 mmto 200 cm, or, the bending loss α_(90deg) of not more than a valuerepresented by Expression (2) below where a cladding portion around eachof the plural cores constitutes a trench-assisted type having a trenchlayer with a relative refractive-index difference of not more than −0.1%with respect to the cladding:0.809 exp(6.64×10⁻²D)√{square root over (XT_(w/oB)R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (1);and1.42 exp(7.78×10⁻²D)√{square root over (XT_(w/oB)R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (2)Here, “virtual crosstalk” means a linear value obtained by converting,after measuring a crosstalk in an optical fiber with a predeterminedfiber length, the measured value to a value in the predetermined fiberlength because a crosstalk (linear value) is proportional to a fiberlength.

The second condition is defined by:

(a) Expression (3) below being defined as Expression (1) from which adefinition concerning a fiber length is removed in the first condition;and Expression (4) below being defined as Expression (2) from which thedefinition concerning the fiber length is removed in the firstcondition:0.809 exp(6.64×10⁻² D)√{square root over (10⁻³ R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (3);and1.42 exp(7.78×10⁻² D)√{square root over (10⁻³ R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (4).Here, the case that the definition concerning a fiber length is removedfrom the first condition means the case of not considering the fiberlength, and the case of not considering the fiber length assumes a casethat a fiber length is unknown or a fiber length is very short ofseveral ten meters,

The third condition is defined by:

(a) a bent portion of each of the plural cores, the bent portion beingfixed in the minimum radius of curvature R_(b) of not more than 7 mm;

(b) a crosstalk between the adjacent cores at the D serving as anadjacent core distance, the crosstalk being not more than 0.01;

(c) a bend supplementary angle falling within the range of 58° to 90°,the bend supplementary angle corresponding to a supplementary angle toan angle at a bending center side out of angles defined by straightportions sandwiching the bent portion in each of the plural cores;

(d) a plane serving as each of the first surface and the second surface,the plane enabling light entrance and light emission to each of theplural cores; and

(e) a height of the optical waveguide with one of the first surface andthe second surface being defined as a bottom surface, the height beingnot more than 10 mm. Here, the bend supplementary angle is an anglecorresponding to a smaller angle out of angles defined by straight linesof the core sandwiching the bent portion.

According to the optical fiber as the optical waveguide, a low crosstalkcan be maintained even though the optical fiber is bent in a minimalradius. In this specification, “minimal radius” means a radius ofcurvature of not more than 7 mm in the case of optical waveguide, and aradius of curvature of not more than 4 mm in the case of optical fiber.

As a second aspect applicable to the above, first aspect, the opticalwaveguide, as the optical waveguide satisfying the first condition orthe second condition, may comprise an inside cladding layer between eachof the plural cores and the associated trench layer, the inside claddinghaving a refractive-index lower than that of each of the plural coresand higher than that of the associated trench layer. Further, as a thirdaspect applicable to at least any one of the above first and secondaspects, in the optical waveguide satisfying the first condition or thesecond condition, a spatial mode of each of the plural cores is afundamental mode, and a mode field diameter of the spatial mode at thepredetermined wavelength may fall within the range of 5.6 μm to 15.7 μm.As a fourth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above first tothird aspects, in the optical waveguide satisfying the first conditionor the second condition, each of the plural cores may guide multiplespatial modes.

As a fifth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above first tofourth aspects, each of the plural cores may comprises plural sub-coresand a sub-cladding having a lower refractive-index lower than the pluralsub-cores. In this fifth aspect, it is preferable that each of theplural sub-cores has an identical refractive-index profile structure,that the number of spatial modes of each of the plural cores is at leastnot less than the number of the plural sub-cores, and that inside eachof the plural cores, a crosstalk between adjacent sub-cores is not lessthan 0.1.

As a sixth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above first tofifth aspects, in the optical waveguide satisfying the first conditionor the second condition, it is preferable that the predeterminedwavelength band is 1.26 μm to 1.625 μm. Such a predetermined wavelengthband assumes a communication wavelength band used for a commonsilica-based optical fiber applicable to the optical waveguide. As aseventh aspect applicable to at least any one of the above first tosixth aspects, in the optical waveguide satisfying the first conditionor the second condition, it is preferable that a cable cutoff wavelengthof each of the plural cores is not more than 1.29 μm assuming the use ofthe optical waveguide in O-band, not more than 1.46 μm assuming the useof the optical waveguide in S-band, or not more than 1.53 μm assumingthe use of the optical waveguide in C-band.

As an eighth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above first toseventh aspects, in the optical waveguide satisfies the first conditionor the second condition, it is preferable that each of the plural coreshas a cable cutoff wavelength of not more than 1.29 μm, that a modefield diameter at a wavelength of 1.31 μm falls within the range of 8.0μm to 10.1 μm, and that at any one wavelength of 1.49 μm and 1.55 μm,the optical waveguide satisfies any one condition of the followingfourth to seventh conditions. This structure indicates properties thateach of the plural cores has to satisfy the case that the opticalwaveguide is applied to an optical interconnect system in a single-modeoperation.

The fourth condition is defined by:

the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 4 mm being not more than0.139 dB/90°; or the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 4 mm beingnot more than 0.288 dB/90° where the trench layer with the relativerefractive-index difference of not more than −0.1% with respect to thecladding is provided between each of the plural cores and the cladding.

The fifth condition is defined by:

the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 3 mm being not more than0.120 dB/90°; or the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 3 mm beingnot more than 0.250 dB/90° where the trench layer with the relativerefractive-index difference of not more than −0.1% with respect to thecladding is provided between each of the plural cores and the cladding.

The sixth condition is defined by:

the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 2 mm being not more than0.098 dB/90°; or the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 2 mm beingnot more than 0.204 dB/90° where the trench layer with the relativerefractive-index difference of not more than −0.1% with respect to thecladding is provided between each of the plural cores and the cladding.

The seventh condition is defined by:

the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 1 mm being not more than 0869dB/90°; or the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 1 mm being notmore than 0.144 dB/90° where the trench layer with the relativerefractive-index difference of not more than −0.1% with respect to thecladding is provided between each of the plural cores and the cladding.

As a ninth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above first toeighth aspects, in the optical waveguide satisfying the first conditionor the second condition, it is preferable that a cable cutoff wavelengthof each of the plural cores is not more than 1.26 μm, that a mode fielddiameter at a wavelength of 1.31 μm falls within the range of 8.0 μm to10.1 μm, and that at a wavelength of 1.49 μm, a bending loss α_(90deg)in the R_(b) of 4 mm is not more than 0,139 dB/90°, and it is furtherpreferable that the trench layer with the relative refractive-indexdifference of not more than −0.2% with respect to the cladding isprovided between each of the plural cores and the cladding, and at thewavelength of 1.49 the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 4 mm isnot more than 0.288 dB/90° where a relative refractive index of each ofthe plural cores with respect to the cladding falls within the range of0.24% to 0.35%.

As a tenth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above first toninth aspects, the optical waveguide may include an optical fiber. Inthis case, the optical waveguide has the bent portion bent so that thebend supplementary angle falls within the range of 58° to 90°, in thebent portion, stress-generated strain caused inside the optical fiber bybending is relieved by a heat treatment processing, and the bent portionis bent with the supplementary angle while the R_(b) is maintained evenwithout external stress.

As a eleventh aspect, an optical fiber transmission system comprises atransmitter, a receiver, and an optical fiber as the optical waveguideaccording to at least any one of the above first to tenth aspects. Inthe optical fiber transmission system according to the eleventh aspect,each of the transmitter and the receiver comprises a waveguide chipcapable of implementing input/output of light, and a housing internallyhaving the waveguide chip. Each of the transmitter and the receiver isoptically connected to the optical fiber so that a surface of thewaveguide chip and the optical fiber take the form of an acute angle inthe range of 74° to 90°. Further, in the housing, the optical fiber isprovided with a bent of the R_(b).

As a twelfth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above first totenth aspects, it is preferable that the optical waveguide, satisfyingthe third condition, where the height of the optical waveguide isdefined as a lower height of the optical waveguide in the other surfacewhile defining one of the first surface and the second surface as abottom surface, has either one of a first structure or a secondstructure, the first structure being defined by the R_(b) of each of theplural cores of not more than 5 mm and the height of not more than 8 mm,the second structure being defined by the R_(b) of each of the pluralcores of not more than 3 mm and the height of not more than 6 mm.

As a thirteenth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above firstto tenth and twelfth aspects, in the optical waveguide satisfies thethird condition, it is preferable that a difference of insertion lossbetween of the plural cores is not more than 1 dB at the predeterminedwavelength, and that the insertion loss is not more than a valuerepresented by Expression (5) below, or, the insertion loss is not morethan a value represented by Expression (6) below where the claddingportion around each of the plural cores constitutes the trench-assistedtype having the trench layer with the relative refractive-index:difference of not more than −0.1% with respect to the cladding:0.809 exp(6.64×10⁻² D)√{square root over (10⁻³ R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (5);and1.42 exp(7.78×10⁻² D)√{square root over (10⁻³ R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (6),

As a fourteenth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above firstto tenth, and twelfth to thirteenth aspects, the optical waveguide maycomprise an inside cladding layer between each of the plural cores andthe associated trench layer, the inside cladding having arefractive-index lower than that of each of the plural cores and higherthan that of the associated trench layer.

As a fifteenth aspect applicable to at least any one of the above firstto tenth, and twelfth to fourteenth aspects, in the optical waveguidesatisfying the third condition, it is preferable that the predeterminedwavelength band is 1.26 μm to 1.625 μm, and that a mode field diameterof a fundamental mode in each of the plural cores falls within the rangeof 5.6 μm to 15.7 μm.

As a sixteenth aspect, an optical fiber transmission system comprising atransmitter, a receiver, and a transmission line, and the transmissionline includes an optical fiber satisfying the first condition and thesecond condition, according to at least any one of the above first totenth, and twelfth to fifteenth aspects. Each of the transmitter and thereceiver comprises a waveguide chip with a function to implementinput/output of signal light, and a housing internally having thewaveguide chip. In the housing, the optical fiber is optically connectedto the waveguide chip through the optical waveguide satisfying the thirdcondition, according to at least any one of the above first to tenth,and twelfth to fifteenth aspects. In each of the transmitter and thereceiver, the surface of the waveguide chip and the plural cores of theoptical waveguide in the housing take the form of acute angle in therange of 74° to 90°.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A to 1C are drawings illustrating a first configuration exampleof an optical transmission link configured including an optical fibertransmission system according to an embodiment.

FIG. 2 is a drawing illustrating a second configuration example of anoptical transmission link configured including an optical fibertransmission system according to an embodiment.

FIGS. 3A and 3B are drawings showing a relationship between crosstalkand radius of curvature of an optical fiber in a case where differenttypes of cores are adjacent (FIG. 3A), and a relationship betweencrosstalk and radius of curvature of an optical fiber in a case wherecores of an identical core-structure are adjacent (FIG. 3B).

FIGS. 4A and 4B are drawings illustrating a configuration in which acladding portion around a core has a matched-cladding type profile.

FIGS. 5A and 5B are drawings illustrating a first configuration in whicha cladding portion around a core has a trench-assisted type profile.

FIGS. 6A and 6B are drawings illustrating a second configuration inwhich a cladding portion around a core has a trench-assisted typeprofile.

FIG. 7 is a drawing showing the result obtained by measuring values ofbending loss coefficient α_(b) and bending-loss-caused crosstalkincrease XT_(b) in an optical fiber with plural cores each having anidentical core-structure and a configuration in which a surroundingcladding has a matched-cladding type profile, for the first embodiment.

FIG. 8 is a drawing showing relationships between coefficient γ aboutbending-loss-caused crosstalk increase and core pitch D between coreseach having an identical core-structure and a configuration in which asurrounding cladding has a matched-cladding type profile, or, betweencores each having an identical core-structure and a configuration inwhich a surrounding cladding portion has a trench-assisted type profile,for the first embodiment.

FIG. 9 is a drawing showing the result obtained by measuring values ofbending loss coefficient α_(b) and bending-loss-caused crosstalkincrease XT_(b) in optical fibers with plural cores each having anidentical structure and a configuration in which a surrounding claddingportion has a matched-cladding type profile, for the second embodiment.

FIG. 10 is a drawing showing the result obtained by measuring values ofbending loss coefficient α_(b) and bending-loss-caused crosstalkincrease XT_(b) in optical fibers with plural cores each having anidentical structure and a configuration in which a surrounding claddingportion has a trench-assisted type profile, for the second embodiment.

FIG. 11 is a drawing showing relationships between coefficient γ aboutbending-loss-caused crosstalk increase and core pitch D between coreseach having an identical structure and a configuration in which asurrounding cladding portion has a matched-cladding type profile, or,between cores each having an identical structure and a configuration inwhich a surrounding cladding portion has a trench-assisted type profile,for the second embodiment.

FIG. 12 is a drawing showing a relationship between XT_(b)/XT_(w/oB),which represents a ratio of crosstalk increase XT_(b) due to minimalbend, to crosstalk XT_(w/oB) without a minimal-radius bend, and(XT_(w/oB)+XT_(b))/XT_(w/oB), a crosstalk increase ratio with aminimal-radius bend.

FIG. 13 is a drawing showing relationships between total crosstalkthrough an entire length of an optical transmission link and bit errorrate under influence of crosstalk, with several permissible values ofpenalty due to crosstalk for transmission quality Q-value.

FIG. 14 is a drawing showing relationships between bend-caused crosstalkincrease XT_(b) per 90° bent portion and XT_(total), in the case of aconfiguration where there are two 90° bent portions in an extremelysmall radius of curvature and where crosstalk in the part other than the90° bent portions has a margin of 3 dB for permissible maximumXT_(total).

FIGS. 15A to 15B are drawings showing examples of cross sectionsperpendicular to an axis extending in a longitudinal direction ofmulti-core optical fibers.

FIGS. 16A and 16B are drawings showing an example of a configuration ofa multi-core optical waveguide according to an embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIGS. 17A and 17B are drawings showing examples of configurations ofmulti-core optical waveguides according to an embodiment of the presentinvention.

FIG. 18 is a drawing illustrating a modification example of aconfiguration of a core in a multi-core optical fiber and a multi-coreoptical waveguide according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 19 is a drawing showing radius-of-curvature dependences ofcumulative failure probability of optical fibers after 10 years with abend of two 90° curves in the optical fibers, at several levels ofcladding diameters.

DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

Embodiments of the present invention will be described below in detailwith reference to the accompanying drawings. The same elements will bedenoted by the same reference signs in the description of the drawings,without redundant description. The main parameters used in the presentspecification are listed in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1 Parameter Unit Description D μm minimum center-center distancebetween adjacent cores XT_(b) * crosstalk increase due to bending lossXT_(b, max) * permissible maximum of XT_(b) XT_(b, max90deg) *XT_(b, max) of core added with 90° bend in radius of curvature R_(b)XT_(total) * total crosstalk in entire length of optical transmissionlink XT_(w/oB) * crosstalk of optical fiber added with bend in radius ofcurvature of 30 mm to 200 cm R_(b) mm radius of acceptable curvatureL_(b) m bend interval length of core in radius of curvature R_(b) α_(b)dB/m bending loss coefficient of core in radius of curvature R_(b) whichcan be expressed by α_(b) = ln(P₁/P₀)/L_(b) where P₀ is output opticalpower of core in straight state and P₁ is output optical power of corewith length L_(b) bent in radius of curvature R_(b) α_(b, dB) dB/mbending loss of core in radius of curvature R_(b) which can be expressedby α_(b, dB) = 10log₁₀(P₁/P₀)/L_(b) α_(90deg) dB/90° bending loss whilebending core at 90° bend in radius of curvature R_(b) (allowing a valueobtained by converting bending loss with different-angle bend to bendingloss with 90° bend) γ m correction factor: XT_(b) = γL_(b)(α_(b))² Theabove symbol “*” is a linear value, and each crosstalk-related parameterin Expression is expressed by a linear value. Here, in the case thatunit “dB” is used as a unit of these parameters in this specificationand figures, these parameters are handles as a parameter expressed by“dB” value corresponding to the linear value. Calculated values of theseparameters are similarly handled.

The below will describe a common configuration to the first and secondembodiments of optical fibers. FIGS. 1A to 1C are drawings illustratinga first configuration example of an optical transmission link configuredincluding an optical fiber (MCF) transmission system according to anembodiment of the present invention. The optical transmission link 1shown in FIG. 1A is configured including two optical transceivers (OT)11, 12, an optical fiber 20 connecting the OTs 11, 12, an electricsignal line 31 connected to the OT 11, and an electric signal line 32connected to the OT 12. Each of the OTs 11, 12 functions as transmitteror receiver. The optical fiber 20 connecting the OTs 11, 12 does nothave to be limited to one consisting of a single fiber, but may be oneconsisting of plural optical fibers spliced by means of a connector,fusion splicing, or butting of end faces.

The OT 11 is configured including a housing 13, and a silicon photonicschip (waveguide chip, SPC) 14 disposed inside the housing 13 andfunctioning to implement input/output of light, and the electric signalline 31 and the optical fiber 20 are connected to the SPC 14. Theoptical fiber 20 has a bent portion C1 formed at an end with a bend in aminimal radius to be connected to the SPC 14, and is fixed to the SPC 14by an MCF connection device 17.

The OT 12 is configured including a housing 13′, and a SPC 14′ disposedinside the housing 13′, and the electric signal line 32 and the opticalfiber 20 are connected to the SPC 14′. The optical fiber 20 has a bentportion C2 formed at an end with a bend in a minimal radius of not morethan 10 mm to be connected to the SPC 14′, and is fixed to the SPC 14′by an MCF connection device 17′.

For connecting the optical fiber 20 to the SPCs, as described above, theoptical fiber 20 needs to be bent by about 90° in an extremely smallradius of curvature inside the housing 13 (or 13′), in order toimplement downsizing of the OTs 11, 12. FIG. 1B shows a state in whichthe optical fiber 20 is provided with a bend of 90° in the permissibleradius of curvature R_(b). FIG. 1C shows a state in which the opticalfiber 20 is provided with a bend of 180° (or two 90° bends) in theR_(b), and this corresponds to a state in which the optical fiber 20 iswound by a half winding on a mandrel with the R_(b)).

FIG. 2 is a drawing illustrating a second configuration example of anoptical transmission link configured including an optical fiber (MCF)transmission system according to an embodiment of the present invention.The optical transmission link 2 shown in FIG. 2 is different in thefollowing point from the optical transmission link 1 in FIGS. 1A to 1C.Namely, it is different from the optical transmission link 1 in that theoptical fiber 20 is connected through an optical waveguide 18 to the SPC14 in the housing 13 of the OT 11.

The optical waveguide 18 provided in the OT 11 has plural cores formedwith a 90° bend in an extremely small radius of curvature inside, andthe cores are connected to the respective cores in the optical fiber 20in one end face, and connected to the SPC 14 in the other end face. Theoptical fiber 20 is connected and fixed to the optical waveguide 18 byan MCF connection device 19.

The same configuration is also applied to the OT 12. Namely, the OT 12has a configuration wherein the optical fiber 20 is fixed to an opticalwaveguide 18′ by an MCF connection device 19′ and wherein the opticalwaveguide 18′ is connected to the SPC 14′.

In the optical transmission link 2 in FIG. 2, the cores 181, 181′ bentin a minimal radius are formed in the optical waveguides 18, 18′,respectively. Namely, the optical transmission link 2 in FIG. 2 isconfigured so that the optical fiber 20 itself is not bent in a minimalradius but the cores 181, 181′ are bent large inside the opticalwaveguides 18, 18′.

Incidentally, it is known that the crosstalk in the optical fiber isaffected by the bend and twist given to the optical fiber, the structureof the fiber, and, particularly, longitudinal variation. The latestinformation is described in M. Koshiba, K. Saitoh, K. Takenaga, and S.Matsuo, “Analytical Expression of Average Power-Coupling Coefficientsfor Estimating Intercore Crosstalk in Multicore Fibers,” IEEE Photon.J., vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 1987-1995, October 2012.

According to the above Literature, it is known that between cores of anidentical core-structure having an equal effective refractive index, thecrosstalk also monotonically decreases as the radius of curvature of theoptical fiber becomes smaller. Between cores of heterogeneous structureshaving different effective refractive indices, the crosstalk suddenlyincreases once with decrease in the radius of curvature of the opticalfiber and then the crosstalk also gradually decreases with furtherdecrease in the radius of curvature thereafter.

The foregoing relationships are shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B. FIG. 3A is adrawing showing the relationship between crosstalk and radius ofcurvature of the optical fiber where different types of cores areadjacent, and FIG. 3B a drawing showing the relationship betweencrosstalk and radius of curvature of the optical fiber where coreshaving an identical core-structure are adjacent. It was expected fromthe conventional information, as shown in FIGS. 3A and 3B, that thecrosstalk decreased when the optical fiber was bent in extremely smallradii of curvature, though there was the difference depending uponwhether the types of adjacent cores are identical or not. Therelationships of FIGS. 3A and 3B are shown in K. Saitoh, M. Koshiba, K.Takenaga, and S. Matsuo, “Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Multi-coreFibers” IEEE Summer Topicals 2012, TuC4.4.

However, the Inventors discovered a phenomenon in which the crosstalkincreased, contrary to the above information, when the optical fiber wasbent in extremely small radii of curvature as shown in FIG. 7, namelywhen the bending loss increased. Then, we conducted research on amechanism of the above-described increase of crosstalk.

We posited a hypothesis that the increase of crosstalk with the opticalfiber being bent in extremely small radii of curvature was caused not bydirect transfer of optical power between spatial modes propagating inrespective cores, but by such indirect transfer that an optical powerpropagating a spatial mode of a certain core was coupled once to acladding mode because of a bending loss and thereafter an optical powerof the cladding mode was further coupled to a spatial mode of anothercore. The Inventors established a new theoretical model based on thishypothesis and conducted research, resulting in discovering that whenthe optical fiber is provided with a bend of a bending loss coefficientα_(b) [/m] in an interval of length L_(b) [m], the crosstalk increaseXT_(b) due to the bending loss between homogeneous cores can beexpressed by Expression (7) below.XT_(b)≈γα_(b) ²L_(b)   (7)

In this expression, γ [m] represents a correction factor for takingaccount of a decrease of coupling coefficient of light from the claddingmode to the spatial mode of the core due to nonuniformity of opticalpower distribution in the cladding and positional relationship of thecores to be coupled with a bending direction.

We confirmed the validity of the above Expression (7) by prototyping anoptical fiber in which each of plural cores has an identicalcore-structure and a peripheral cladding portion is a matched-claddingtype and an optical fiber in which plural cores has an identicalcore-stricture and a peripheral cladding portion is a trench-assistedtype, and then checking relationships between the bending losscoefficient α_(b) and the bending loss-caused crosstalk increase XT_(b),using them.

The core with the peripheral cladding portion of the matched-claddingtype has a refractive index profile in the configuration shown in FIG.4A. A cross-sectional view of the core and the periphery thereof isshown in FIG. 4B. Namely, in the configuration shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B,the periphery of the core 401 is covered around by a uniform cladding402 having a lower refractive index than the core 401.

An example of a refractive index profile the core with the peripheralcladding portion of the trench-assisted type is shown in FIG. 5A and across-sectional view of the core and the periphery thereof is shown inFIG. 5B. In the trench-assisted type shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B, a trenchlayer 413 having a lower refractive index than the cladding 412 isprovided between the core 411 and the cladding 412, in FIG. 5A, Δcrepresents a relative refractive-index difference of the core 411 withrespect to the cladding 412, Δd a relative refractive-index differenceof the trench layer 413 with respect to the cladding 412, 2 a the corediameter, and 2 b the outer diameter of the trench layer.

The optical communication in the transmission links using the SPCs inthe transceivers is earned out mainly using light at the wavelength of1.31 μm, 1.49 μm, or 1.55 μm. Particularly, short-haul opticalcommunication is performed often using the wavelengths of 1.31 μm and1.49 μm. The optical waveguides (including optical fibers) according tothe present embodiment preferably, in short-haul use, have the cablecutoff wavelength of not more than 1.29 μm and the predeterminedwavelength of not less than 1.49 μm, and preferably, in normal use, havethe cable cutoff wavelength of not more than 1.26 μm and thepredetermined wavelength of not less than 1.55 μm. In that case, themode field diameter at the wavelength of 1.31 μm has a typical value ofnot less than 8.6 μm, a deviation from the typical value is preferablynot more than ±0.6 μm, and the typical value is preferably not more than9.5 μm. Namely, the mode field diameter at the wavelength of 1.31 μm ispreferably in the range of 8.0 μm to 10.1 μm. The predetermined radiusof curvature R_(b) is preferably small in response to downsizing ofconnection device, such as not more than 4.0 mm, not more than 15 mm,not more than 3.0 mm, not more than 2.5 mm, not more than 2.0 mm, notmore than 1.5 mm, and not more than 1.0 mm. In order to keep the bendingloss-caused crosstalk increase XT_(b) not more than 0.001 (or not morethan −30 dB) per 90° bend even with D being sufficiently short, 15 μm,the combination (radius of curvature, maximum value of permissiblebending loss), indicating the relationship between the predeterminedradius of curvature (mm) and the maximum value (dB/90°) of permissiblebending loss in a 90° bent at a predetermined wavelength, is preferably(4.0, 0.139), (3.5, 0.130), (3.0, 0.120), (2.5, 0.110), (2.0, 0.098),(1.5, 0.085), or (1.0, 0.069).

When the trench layer with the relative refractive-index difference ofnot more than −0.1% with respect to the cladding is provided between thecores and the cladding, the permissible bending loss in R_(b) bent at apredetermined wavelength with respect to the permissible radius ofcurvature R_(h) is 0.288 dB/90° with respect to 4.0 mm, 0.270 dB/90°with respect to 3.5 mm, t0.250 dB/90° with respect to 3.0 mm, 0.228dB/90° with respect to 2.5 mm, 0.204 dB/90° with respect to 2.0 mm,0.177 dB/90° with respect to 1.5 mm, and 0.144 dB/90° with respect to1.0 mm.

For realizing the mode field diameter at the wavelength of 1.31 μm being8.6 μm, the cable cutoff wavelength being not more than 1.26 μm, and thecrosstalk increase XT_(b, max90deg) at the wavelength of 1.49 μm due toone 90° bend in the radius of curvature R_(b)=4 mm being not more than0.001 (or not more than −30 dB), the refractive index profile shown inFIG. 5A preferably has the trench layer, Δd is preferably not more thanat least −0.2%, more preferably not more than −0.3%, and still morepreferably not more than −0.5%. In view of the bending loss and cutoffwavelength, Δc is preferably not more than at least 0.35%, morepreferably not more than 0.3%, and still more preferably not more than0.25%. However, if Δc is too small, there will be a confinement losswhich is a loss due to leakage of light confined in the core, into thecladding. For keeping the confinement loss not more than 0.01 dB/km, forexample, at the wavelength of 1.55 μm, Δc is preferably not less than0.24%. For setting the mode field diameter at the wavelength of 1.31 μmin the range of 8.0 μm to 9.2 μm, 2 a is preferably determined in therange of 9.3 μm to 11.8 μm. Particularly, combinations of the parametersin (i) and (ii) below can realize especially good characteristics interms of all of the mode field diameter, bending loss, cutoffwavelength, and confinement loss.Δc=0.28%, Δd=−0.5%, 2a=10.6 μm, 1.95≦b/a≦2.4  (i)Δc=0.30%, Δd=−0.5%, 2a=10.6 μm, 1.74≦b/a≦2.19  (ii)

Next, a refractive index profile of another configuration example of thecore with the peripheral cladding portion of the trench-assisted type isshown in FIG. 6A and a cross-sectional view of the core and theperiphery thereof is shown in FIG. 6B. The trench-assisted type shown inFIGS. 6A and 6B may be provided with an inside cladding layer 414 havinga refractive index lower than that of the core 411 and higher than thatof the trench layer 413, between the core 411 and the bench layer 413.It should be noted that in FIGS. 4B, 5B, and 6B, the boundary around thecladding 412 does not mean the end of the cladding but means only aconceptual expression of a rectangular region extracted from the fibercross section.

(First Embodiment of Optical Fiber)

Next, FIG. 7 shows the result obtained by measuring values of thebending loss coefficient α_(b) and the bending loss-caused crosstalkincrease XT_(b) in the optical fiber in which each of plural cores hasan identical core-structure and a peripheral cladding portion is amatched-cladding type, and finding a relationship between them. Thebending loss-caused crosstalk increase XT_(b) was measured from anincrease (linear value) of a crosstalk with a bend in a certain radiusof curvature to cause a bending loss, in an interval of 2 m of thesufficiently long optical fiber, from a crosstalk without the bend.

On the basis of the conventional information, the crosstalk mustdecrease in the interval with the bend. Since the length of the intervalwith the bend is sufficiently shorter than the entire length of theoptical fiber, the crosstalk in the unbent intervals should show littlechange and the foregoing increase can be regarded as the bend-causedcrosstalk increase XT_(b) represented by Expression (7). Since FIG. 7 isa double logarithmic graph, the graph is represented by a straight linewhen satisfying the relation of y=cx^(d) (y is a vertical axisparameter; x is a horizontal axis parameter). By taking the logarithm ofboth sides of this equation, we obtain log(y)=d log(x)+log(c). Namely,it is seen that d affects the slope of the straight line and c they-intercept of the straight line. While this equation of the straightline is compared with FIG. 7, a further study will be made on the basisof the above Expression (7). According to this study, x corresponds toα_(b), and γL_(b) does to c, d becomes 2, from Expression (7);therefore, a line obtained by fitting Expression (7) having only γ as avariable to the measured values is the straight line in FIG. 7. FIG. 7includes the measured data at different levels of radii of curvature andwavelengths. However, it was confirmed that, as shown in FIG. 7, therelationship between XT_(b) and α_(b) satisfied Expression (7),irrespective of the radii of curvature and the wavelengths, and that γvaried depending on the core pitch.

Next, FIG. 8 shows relationships between the core pitch D and the factorγ about the bending logs-caused crosstalk increase in optical fiberseach having plural cores with an identical core-structure, a peripheralcladding portion of a matched-cladding type, and plural different corepitches (MC-MCFs) and in optical fibers each having plural cores anidentical core-structure, a peripheral cladding portion of atrench-assisted type cores, and plural different core pitches (TA-MCFs).In FIG. 8, graph G810 represents an approximate straight line for themeasured values of the MC-MCFs given by y=0.0453exp(−0.133x), and graphG820 an approximate straight line for the measured values of the TA-MCFsgiven by y=0.0146exp(−0.156x). The factor γ is also dependent on thepositional relationship between cores, and maxima of γ acquired at therespective core pitches are plotted in FIG. 8. It was confirmed from theresult of FIG. 8 that γ exponentially decreased with increase of D inthe both cases between the cores with the peripheral cladding portion ofthe matched-cladding type and between the cores with the peripheralcladding portion of the trench-assisted type. Specifically, in the casebetween the cores with the peripheral cladding portion of thematched-cladding type, Expression (8) below is satisfied, and in thecase between the cores with the peripheral cladding portion of thetrench-assisted type, Expression (9) below is satisfied. The unit of γis [m] and the unit of D [μm]. In the case with the trench layer, theoptical power leaking into the cladding is less likely to enter theregions inside the trenches around the other cores (i.e., overlaps ofelectric fields between the core mode and the cladding mode becomesmaller), and therefore it is understood that γ becomes smaller than inthe case without the trench layer. Therefore, in cases where even ifthere is a layer having a lower refractive index than the claddingbetween the cores and the cladding of the optical fiber, the refractiveindex of that layer is not low enough (e.g., the relativerefractive-index difference with respect to the cladding is more than−0.1%), γ of the fiber is considered to be expressed by Expression (8).For γ to be expressed by Expression (9), it can be said that therefractive index of the trench layer is preferably sufficiently lowerthan that of the cladding and that at least the relativerefractive-index difference of the trench layer with respect to thecladding is preferably not more than −0.1%, more preferably not morethan −0.2%, still more preferably not more than −0.3%, yet morepreferably not more than −0.4%, yet more preferably not more than −0.5%,yet more preferably not more than −0.6%, and yet furthermore preferablynot more than −0.7%.γ=4.53×10⁻² exp(−1.33×10⁻¹ D)   (8)γ=1.46×10⁻² exp(−1.56×10⁻² D)   (9)

By finding the bending loss-caused crosstalk increase occurring betweenthe cores each having the identical core-structure and the peripheralcladding portion of the matched-cladding type cores on the basis of theabove Expressions (7) and (8), using the relational expression α_(b)[m]=(ln 10/10)α_(b), [dB/m] about the bending loss coefficient α_(b), weobtain Expression (10) below.

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{XT}_{b} \approx {\left\lbrack {4.53 \times 10^{- 2}{\exp\left( {{- 1.33} \times 10^{- 1}D} \right)}} \right\rbrack\left( {\frac{\ln\; 10}{10}\alpha_{b,{dB}}} \right)^{2}L_{b}}} \\{\approx {2.40 \times 10^{- 3}\alpha_{b,{dB}}^{2}L_{b}{\exp\left( {{- 1.33} \times 10^{- 1}D} \right)}}}\end{matrix} & (10)\end{matrix}$

By finding the bending loss-caused crosstalk increase occurring betweenthe cores each having the identical core-structure and the peripheralcladding portion of the trench-assisted type on the basis of the aboveExpressions (7) and (9), we obtain Expression (11) below.

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{XT}_{b} \approx {\left\lbrack {1.46 \times 10^{- 2}{\exp\left( {{- 1.56} \times 10^{- 1}D} \right)}} \right\rbrack\left( {\frac{\ln\; 10}{10}\alpha_{b,{dB}}} \right)^{2}L_{b}}} \\{\approx {7.74 \times 10^{- 4}\alpha_{b,{dB}}^{2}L_{b}{\exp\left( {{- 1.56} \times 10^{- 1}D} \right)}}}\end{matrix} & (11)\end{matrix}$

When a permissible maximum of the bending loss-caused crosstalk increaseXT_(b) is denoted by XT_(b, max), it is found from Expression (10) thatXT_(b) can be controlled to not more than the permissible maximumXT_(b, max) when the optical fiber composed of the cores each having theidentical core-structure and the peripheral cladding portion of thematched-cladding type (or, composed of the cores each having theperipheral cladding portion in which the trench layer of thesufficiently-low refractive index is not provided) satisfies Expression(12) below.

$\begin{matrix}{{2.40 \times 10^{- 3}\alpha_{b,{dB}}^{2}L_{b}{\exp\left( {{- 1.33} \times 10^{- 1}D} \right)}} \leq {{XT}_{b,\max}\alpha_{b,{dB}}L_{b}} \leq {20.4\;{\exp\left( {6.64 \times 10^{- 2}D} \right)}\sqrt{{XT}_{b,\max}L_{b}}}} & (12)\end{matrix}$

It is also found from Expression (11) that XT_(b) can be controlled tonot more than the permissible maximum XT_(b, max) when the optical fibercomposed of the cores each having the identical core-structure and theperipheral cladding portion of the trench-assisted type (or, composed ofthe cores each having the peripheral cladding portion in which thetrench layer of the sufficiently-low refractive index is provided)satisfies Expression (13) below.

$\begin{matrix}{{7.74 \times 10^{- 4}\alpha_{b,{dB}}^{2}L_{b}{\exp\left( {{- 1.56} \times 10^{- 1}D} \right)}} \leq {{XT}_{b,\max}\alpha_{b,{dB}}L_{b}} \leq {35.9\;{\exp\left( {7.78 \times 10^{- 2}D} \right)}\sqrt{{XT}_{b,\max}L_{b}}}} & (13)\end{matrix}$

The bending loss α_(90deg) [dB/90°] occurring with a 90° bend of thecores in the radius of curvature R_(b) [mm] needs to satisfy Expression(14) below in order to control XT_(b) to not more than maximumXL_(b, max90deg), based on Expression (12), in the optical fibercomposed of the cores each having the identical core-structure and theperipheral cladding portion of the matched-cladding type (or, composedof the cores each having the peripheral cladding portion in which thetrench layer of the sufficiently-low refractive index is not provided),where XT_(b, max90deg) represents a permissible maximum of thebend-caused crosstalk increase XT_(b) due to the bend in the 90° bentcase and a relational expression of L_(b) [m]=(π/2)(10⁻³R_(b)) is used.α_(90deg)≦0.809 exp(6.64×10⁻² D)√{square root over (XT_(b,max90deg) R_(b))}  (14)

In the case of the optical fiber composed of the cores each having theidentical core-structure and the peripheral cladding portion of thetrench-assisted type (i.e., composed of the cores each having theperipheral cladding portion in which the trench layer of thesufficiently-low refractive index is provided), the bending lossα_(90deg) needs to satisfy Expression (15) below in order to controlXT_(b) to not more than the maximum XT_(b,max90deg), based on Expression(13).α_(90deg)≦1.42 exp(7.78×10⁻² D)√{square root over (XT_(b,max90deg) R_(b))}  (15)

(Second Embodiment of Optical Fiber)

In the second embodiment, FIG. 9 shows the result obtained by measuringvalues of the bending loss coefficient α_(b) and the bending loss-causedcrosstalk increase XT_(b) in optical fibers in which each of pluralcores has an identical core-structure and a peripheral cladding portionis a matched-cladding type, and finding relationships between them,i.e., graphs corresponding to FIG. 7 in the first embodiment. In thecase of this second embodiment, as in the first embodiment, FIG. 9 alsoshows double logarithmic graphs, and thus the graphs are represented bystraight lines when satisfying the relation of γ=cx^(d). By taking thelogarithm of both sides of this equation, we obtain log(y)=dlog(x)+log(c). Namely, it is seen that d affects the slope of thestraight line and c the intercept of the straight line. While thisequation of the straight line is compared with FIG. 9, a further studywill be made on the basis of the foregoing Expression (7). According tothis study, x corresponds to α_(b), and γL_(b) does to c, d becomes 2from Expression (7); therefore, lines obtained by fitting Expression (7)having only γ as a variable to the measured values are the straight lineand dashed line in FIG. 9. FIG. 9 includes the measured data atdifferent levels of radii of curvature and wavelengths, at each of twolevels of core pitches, 45.4 μm (graph G910) and 91.8 μm (graph G920).Graph G910 shows the approximate straight line XT_(b)=(4.03×10⁻⁵[m])(α_(b)[/m])²(L_(b)[m]) and Graph G920 the approximate straight lineXT_(b)=(4.68×10⁻⁶ [m])(α_(b)[m])²(L_(b)[m]). However, it was confirmedthat, as shown in FIG. 9, the relationships between XT_(b) and α_(b)satisfied Expression (7), irrespective of the radii of curvature and thewavelengths, and that γ varied depending on the core pitch.

Next, FIG. 10 shows, as FIG. 9 does, the result obtained by measuringvalues of the bending loss coefficient α_(b) and the bending loss-causedcrosstalk increase XT_(b) in optical fibers in which each of pluralcores has an identical core-structure and a peripheral cladding portionis a trench-assisted type, and finding relationships between them. Thetrench layer of the optical fibers is one having the relativerefractive-index difference of not more than −0.4% with respect to thecladding and the ratio of the inner diameter to the outer diameter ofthe trench layer being not more than 0.9. The measured values in FIG. 10include the measured data at different levels of radii of curvature andwavelengths, at each of two levels of core pitches, 45 μm (graph G1010)and 51 μm (graph G1020). Graph G1010 shows the approximate straight lineXT_(b)=1.28×10⁻⁵ [m] (=(α_(b)[/m])²(γL_(b)[m])) and Graph G1020 theapproximate straight line XT_(b)=7.90×10⁻⁶ [m](=(α_(b)[/m])²(γL_(b)[m])). However, it was confirmed that, as shown inFIG. 10, the relationships between XT_(b) and α_(b) satisfied Expression(7), irrespective of the radii of curvature and the wavelengths, andthat γ varied depending on the core pitch. This result is the same as inthe case of the optical fibers shown in FIG. 9, having the cores withthe peripheral cladding portion of the matched-cladding type.

FIG. 11 shows relationships between the coefficient γ about the bendingloss-caused crosstalk increase and the core pitch D between cores eachhaving the identical core-structure and the peripheral cladding portionof the matched-cladding type or between the cores each having theidentical core-structure and the peripheral cladding portion of thetrench-assisted type. In FIG. 11, graph G1110 represents an approximatestraight line (y=cx⁻³) for the matched-cladding optical fibers(matched-cladding MCFs), and graph G1120 an approximate straight line(y=cx⁻³) for the trench-assisted optical fibers (trench-assisted MCFs).It was confirmed from the result of FIG. 11 that the both cases betweenthe cores with the peripheral cladding portion of the matched-claddingtype and between the cores with the peripheral cladding portion of thetrench-assisted type satisfied the relation of γ∝D⁻³. Specifically, inthe case between the cores with the peripheral cladding portion of thematched-cladding type, Expression (16) below is satisfied, and in thecase between the cores with the peripheral cladding portion of thetrench-assisted type, Expression (17) below is satisfied. The unit of γis [m] and the unit of D [μ]. In the case with the trench layer, theoptical power leaking into the cladding is less likely to enter theregions inside the trenches around the other cores (i.e., overlaps ofelectric fields between the core mode and the cladding mode becomesmaller). Regarding the optical power leaking into the cladding, in thiscase, γ becomes smaller than in the case without the trench layer.Therefore, in cases where even if there is a layer having a lowerrefractive index than the cladding between the cores and the cladding ofthe optical fiber, the refractive index of that layer is not low enough(e.g., the relative refractive-index difference of the layer withrespect to the cladding is more than −0.1%), γ of the fiber isconsidered to be expressed by Expression (16). For γ to be expressed byExpression (17), it can be said that the refractive index of the trenchlayer is preferably sufficiently lower than that of the cladding andthat at least the relative refractive-index difference of the trenchlayer with respect to the cladding is preferably not more than −0.1%,more preferably not more than −0.2%, still more preferably not more than−0.3%, yet more preferably not more than −0.4%, yet more preferably notmore than −0.5%, yet more preferably not more than −0.6%, and yetfurthermore preferably not more than −0.7%.

$\begin{matrix}{\gamma = \frac{3.7}{D^{3}}} & (16) \\{\gamma = \frac{1.1}{D^{3}}} & (17)\end{matrix}$

The description in the foregoing paragraphs [0047] to [0052] about thefirst embodiment also applies to this second embodiment. However, whenthe description in the foregoing paragraphs [0047] to [0052] applies tothis second embodiment, the description in each paragraph should be readas follows: the above Expression (10) is replaced by Expression (18)below; the above Expression (11) by Expression (19) below; the aboveExpression (12) by Expression (20) below; the above Expression (13) byExpression (21) below; the above Expression (14) by Expression (22)below; the above Expression (15) by Expression (23) below.

$\begin{matrix}\begin{matrix}{{XT}_{b} \approx {\frac{3.7}{D^{3}}\left( {\frac{\ln\; 10}{10}\alpha_{b,{dB}}} \right)^{2}L_{b}}} \\{\approx {0.20\frac{\alpha_{b,{dB}}^{2}}{D^{3}}L_{b}}}\end{matrix} & (18) \\\begin{matrix}{{XT}_{b} \approx {\frac{1.1}{D^{3}}\left( {\frac{\ln\; 10}{10}\alpha_{b,{dB}}} \right)^{2}L_{b}}} \\{\approx {0.059\frac{\alpha_{b,{dB}}^{2}}{D^{3}}L_{b}}}\end{matrix} & (19) \\{{{0.20\frac{\alpha_{b,{dB}}^{2}}{D^{3}}L_{b}} \leq {XT}_{b,\max}}{{\alpha_{b,{dB}}L_{b}} \leq \sqrt{D^{3}\frac{{XT}_{b,\max}}{0.20}L_{b}}}} & (20) \\{{{0.059\frac{\alpha_{b,{dB}}^{2}}{D^{3}}L_{b}} \leq {XT}_{b,\max}}{{\alpha_{b,{dB}}L_{b}} \leq \sqrt{D^{3}\frac{{XT}_{b,\max}}{0.059}L_{b}}}} & (21) \\{\alpha_{90\;\deg} \leq \sqrt{D^{3}\frac{{XT}_{b,{\max\; 90\;\deg}}}{0.20}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{b}}} & (22) \\{\alpha_{90\;\deg} \leq \sqrt{D^{3}\frac{{XT}_{b,{\max\; 90\;\deg}}}{0.059}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{b}}} & (23)\end{matrix}$

The below is the description common to the first and second embodimentsof the optical fibers.

For making the housing of the OT more compact (or more downsized), theoptical fiber satisfies the aforementioned Expression (14) or Expression(15) (likewise, Expression (22) or Expression (23)) preferably withR_(b) being not more than 7 mm, more preferably with R_(b) being notmore than 6 mm, still more preferably with R_(b) being not more than 5mm, yet more preferably with R_(b) being not more than 4 mm, yet morepreferably with R_(b) being not more than 3 mm, yet more preferably withR_(b) being not more than 2 mm, and yet more preferably with R_(b) beingnot more than 1 mm.

FIG. 12 shows a relationship between XT_(b)/XT_(w/oB), which representsa ratio of minimal-bend-caused crosstalk increase XT_(b) to crosstalkXT_(w/oB) in a state without the minimal-radius bend, and(XT_(w/oB)+XT_(w/oB))/XT_(w/oB), a crosstalk increase ratio with theminimal-radius bend. According to FIG. 12, in order to avoid a suddenrise of (XT_(w/oB)+XT_(b))/XT_(w/oB), (XT_(w/oB)+XT_(b))/XT_(w/oB) ispreferably not more than 2 (not more than 3 dB) and more preferably notmore than 1.26 (not more than 1 dB). Due to the same reason,XT_(b)/XT_(w/oB) is preferably not more than 1 (not more than 0 dB) andmore preferably not more than ¼ (not more than −6 dB). In order tosatisfy the above relationship, XT_(b, max90deg) in Expression (14) orExpression (15) (similarly, in Expression (22) or Expression (23)) ispreferably not more than XT_(w/oB) and more preferably not more thanXT_(w/oB)/4.

Namely, the crosstalk XT_(w/oB) to a predetermined core from other coresat a predetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having no bend inthe radius of curvature of less, than 30 mm is preferably not more than−20 dB, and the crosstalk to the predetermined core from other cores atthe predetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having a 90° bend ina predetermined radius of curvature R_(b) [mm] not more than the radiusof curvature of 7 mm is preferably not more than 2 times and morepreferably not more than 1.26 times XT_(w/oB). XT_(w/oB) is preferablymeasured in a state in which almost entire length of the optical fiberis in the range of radius of curvature from 30 mm to 200 m, and theupper limit of the radius of curvature in the measurement, in terms ofsuppressing XT_(b) even if XT_(w/oB) is smaller, is more preferably 100cm, still more preferably 50 cm, yet more preferably 30 cm, yet morepreferably 20 cm, most preferably 10 cm.

Next, FIG. 13 shows relationships between total crosstalk through theentire length of the optical transmission link and bit error rate underinfluence of crosstalk, at several levels of permissible values(Q-Penalty) as crosstalk-caused penalty for transmission quality Q-valuewhen a modulation method employed is On-Off-Keying (OOK), PolarizationDivision Multiplexed-Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (PDM-QPSK), orPolarization-Division-Multiplexed 16-ary Quadrature-Amplitude Modulation(PDM-16QAM). Specifically, concerning the relationship betweenmodulation method and Q-Penalty (dB) in each graph, graph G1310 shows0.1 dB in the modulation method OOK, graph G1320 1 dB in the modulationmethod PDM-QPSK, graph G1330 0.5 dB in the modulation method OOK, andgraph G1340 0.5 dB in the modulation method PDM-16QAM.

From the relationships between total crosstalk XT_(total) through theentire length of the optical transmission link and bit error rate (BER),as shown in FIG. 13, let us consider, for example, a situation whereonly 0.1 dB is permitted as crosstalk-caused penalty (Q-penalty) fortransmission quality Q-value, in the case of On-Off-Keying (OOK)frequently used in short-haul transmission. In this situation, forrealizing error-free transmission with BER<10⁻¹⁴, XT_(total) needs to benot more than −40 dB (equivalent to the linear value of not more than10⁻⁴). On the other hand, in a situation where 1 dB is permitted asQ-Penalty in the case of Polarization Division Multiplexed-QuadraturePhase Shift Keying (PDM-QPSK) frequently used in long-haul transmission,for realizing BER<10⁻³ to enable satisfactory error-free transmission byhard-decision error correction, XT_(total) needs to be not more than −17dB (equivalent to the linear value of not more than 2×10⁻²).Furthermore, in a situation where 0.5 dB is permitted as Q-Penalty inthe case of Polarization-Division-Multiplexed 16-aryQuadrature-Amplitude Modulation (PDM-16QAM) expected to be used forlong-haul transmission in future, for realizing BER<10⁻³ to enablesatisfactory error-free transmission by hard-decision error correction,XT_(total) needs to be not more than −27 dB (equivalent to the linearvalue of not more than 2×10⁻³).

FIG. 14 shows relationships between bend-caused crosstalk increaseXT_(b) per 90°-bent portion and XT_(total) in the case of theconfiguration of FIG. 1A where there are two 90°-bent portions in anextremely small radius of curvature, in an optical transmission linkconfiguration using an optical fiber wherein there are two closest coresto a certain core, and where the crosstalk in the part other than the90°-bent portions has the margin of 3 dB for the permissible maximumXT_(total). In FIG. 14, the data is plotted for the cases of permissiblemaximum XT_(total) being −17 dB, −27 dB, and −40 dB, and it is seen ineach of the cases that with increase of XT_(b), XT_(total) startssuddenly increasing at a certain point. In order to suppress aconsiderable increase of XT_(total) and keeping it smaller than thepermissible maximum XT_(total), it is seen from FIG. 14 that, as therelationship between the permissible maximum value of XT_(total) and theupper limit of the corresponding XT_(b), XT_(b) is not more than about10⁻³ in the case of XT_(total) being −17 dB (not more than −20 dB),XT_(b) is not more than about 10⁻⁴ in the case of XT_(total) being −27dB (not more than −30 dB), and XT_(b) is not more than about 10⁻⁵ in thecase of XT_(total) being −40 dB (not more than −43 dB). Therefore,XT_(b, max90deg) in Expression (14) and Expression (15) (also similarlyin Expression (22) and Expression (23)) is preferably not more than10⁻³, more preferably not more than 10⁻⁴, and still more preferably notmore than 10⁻⁵.

Examples of cross sections perpendicular to an axis extending in thelongitudinal direction of the optical fibers suitably used in theembodiments are shown in FIGS. 15A, to 15D. In the examples of FIGS. 15Ato 15D, plural cores 511 of an identical core-structure are covered by acladding 512 having a lower refractive index than the cores 511.Preferably, the outside of the cladding 512 is covered by a coating 513as shown in the examples of FIGS. 15A to 15D.

The optical fiber 501 in FIG. 15A has seven cores 511, one in the centerof the optical fiber and six around it, and core-to-core distances areequal. The optical fiber 502 in FIG. 15B has two sets of four cores 511arranged in a line and separated in parallel with each other. Theoptical fiber 503 in FIG. 15C has eight cores 511 arranged at equalintervals on a predetermined circumference. Furthermore, the opticalfiber 504 in FIG. 15D has the cladding 512 in an approximatelyrectangular cross section formed so that each set of four cores 511 ofthe optical fiber 502 in FIG. 15B is located on the long-edge side.

In the foregoing optical fibers 501 to 504, for suppressing propagationof the cladding mode, the refractive index of the coating 513 ispreferably higher than that of the cladding 512, and more preferablyhigher than that of the cores 511. In view of preventing increase oftransmission loss of the cores 511 due to coupling to the coating 513,of light propagating in the cores 511 near the interface between thecladding 512 and the coating 513, the refractive index of the coating513 is preferably lower than that of the cores 511. It should be notedthat the numbers and constellations of the cores do not have to belimited to those in the examples shown in FIGS. 15A to 15D. A preferredconstituent material of the cores and the cladding is glass or resin anda more preferred material is pure silica glass or silica glasscontaining an additive. A preferred constituent material of the coatingis resin, carbon, or metal. The coating may be comprised of a pluralityof layers comprised of different materials.

When the fiber length is not more than 10 km, the aforementioned actionis effectively achieved; however, in use of a short-haul transmission(transmission in high performance computing, data center, and the like)in which many bends with a minimal diameter can be provided, it is morepreferable that a crosstalk increase ratio is suppressed in a fiberlength of not more than 1 km, still more preferable that a crosstalkincrease ratio is suppressed in a fiber length of not more than 100 m,and most preferable that a crosstalk increase ratio in a fiber length ofnot more than 10 m, in the light of suppressing the crosstalk increaseratio (XT_(w/oB)+XT_(b))/XT_(w/oB) even if XT_(w/oB) in the entirelength of an optical fiber is small due to a short fiber length.

The minimum value D of center-to-center distance between adjacent coresin the foregoing optical fibers is preferably in the range of 15 to 60μm, and the upper limit thereof is, in the light of downsizing, morepreferably not more than 50 μm, still more preferably not more than 40μm, and most preferably not more than 30 μm.

In the light of blocking high-order spatial modes not used in signaltransmission, a loss in the radius of curvature R_(b) of higher-orderspatial modes than a predetermined spatial mode of the cores ispreferably at least 19.3 dB per 90° larger than a loss in the radius ofcurvature R_(b) of the predetermined spatial mode. The loss in theradius of curvature of 140 mm of the higher-order spatial modes than thepredetermined spatial mode of the cores is preferably not less than 1dB/m and the loss in the radius of curvature of 140 mm of thepredetermined spatial mode is preferably not more than 0.1 dB/m.Furthermore, the foregoing predetermined spatial mode is preferably ahigher-order spatial mode other than a fundamental mode.

We can also adopt a mode wherein the predetermined spatial mode is thefundamental mode and wherein the mode field diameter of the fundamentalmode at a predetermined wavelength can be fallen within the range of 5.6μm to 15.7 μm (more preferably not less than 7.9 μm). When thepredetermined wavelength belongs to the predetermined wavelength band offor example 1.26 μm to 1.625 μm, a general optical communication can berealized. Specifically, When the foregoing predetermined wavelength is1.31 μm and the cable cutoff wavelength of the cores is not more than1.29 μm, the optical fiber can be applied to O-band. Furthermore, whenthe predetermined wavelength is 1.49 μm and the cable cutoff wavelengthof the cores is not more than 1.46 μm, the optical fiber can be appliedto S-band. Moreover, when the predetermined wavelength is 1.55 μm andthe cable cutoff wavelength of the cores is not more than 1.53 μm, theoptical fiber can be applied to C-band.

The examples shown in FIGS. 15A to 15D show a part of the examples ofcross sections perpendicular to the axis extending in the longitudinaldirection of the optical fibers, and it should be noted that thecross-sectional shapes of the optical fibers do not have to be limitedto those shown in FIGS. 15A to 15D.

Next, an example of a configuration of an optical waveguide according toan embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIGS. 16A and 16B andFIGS. 17A and 17B. This optical waveguide is one used in the opticaltransmission link 2 shown in FIG. 2. FIG. 16A is a perspective viewillustrating the configuration of the optical waveguide 18 and FIG. 16Ba drawing illustrating a first plane 18A (first surface) and a secondplane 18B (second surface) in which cores of the optical waveguide areexposed.

The optical waveguide 18 has plural cores 181 of an identicalcore-structure covered by a cladding 182 having a lower refractive indexthan the cores 181. The cladding 182 may be covered by a coating. Lightcan be guided through the first plane 18A and the second plane 18B ofthe optical waveguide 18 into or out of the cores 181. Each core 181 hasa bent portion C3 in an extremely small radius of curvature (not morethan 10 mm).

The bent portion will be further described using FIGS. 17A and 17B. FIG.17A is an example where an angle between the first plane 18A and thesecond plane 18B is larger than 90° and FIG. 17B an example where theangle between the first plane 18A and the second plane 18B is smallerthan 90°. As shown in FIGS. 17A and 17B, the plural cores 181 in bentportion C3 are arranged in parallel and bent in the range of 58° to 90°.Namely, an angle 180A, serving as a supplementary angle of the bentportion in FIGS. 17A and 17B, is preferably in the range of 58° to 90°and more preferably in the range of 74° to 90°. An angle 181A betweenthe first plane 18A and the cores 181 and an angle 181B between thesecond plane 18B and the cores 181 are preferably right angles, howeverin the light of suppressing that the reflected light at an end surfaceenter the cores, an acute angles is preferably not less than 74° andmore preferably in the range of 81° to 83°. Since the number of coresand the core constellation are adequately changed according to theoptical fiber, they are not limited to those in the example shown inFIGS. 16A, 16B and FIGS. 17A, 17B. The core constellation and corediameter in the first plane 18A may be different from those in thesecond plane 18B. A preferred constituent material of the cores 181 andcladding 182 of the optical waveguide 18 is glass or resin and a morepreferred constituent material is pure silica glass or silica glasscontaining an additive.

For achieving downsizing, it is preferable that the height of cores ofoptical waveguide, namely the height of from 18A to the height of thelowest core at 18B is changed according to a radius of curvature of thecores. For example, the height of the cores of the optical waveguidewith respect to the radius of curvature of the bent portions of thecores is preferably not more than 10 mm with respect to not more than 7mm, not more than 9 mm with respect to not more than 6 mm, not more than9 mm and more preferably not more than 8 mm with respect to not morethan 5 mm, not more than 7 mm with respect to not more than 4 mm, notmore than 6 mm with respect to not more than 3 mm, not more than 5 mmwith respect to not more than 2 mm, and not more than 4 mm with respectto not more than 1 mm.

When the minimum radius of curvature is denoted by R_(b), the bendingloss of each of the cores in the optical waveguide of the presentinvention, as in the case of the optical fibers of the presentinvention, satisfies Expression (14) or Expression (15) preferably withR_(b) being not more than 7 mm, more preferably not more than 6 mm,still more preferably not more than 5 mm, yet more preferably not morethan 4 mm, yet more preferably not more than 3 mm, yet more preferablynot more than 2 mm, and most preferably not more than 1 mm. In anoptical waveguide in which a bending loss cannot be measured since thebend of the cores as a component is fixed, no distinction is madebetween transmission loss due to scattering and absorption in theoptical waveguide and bending loss; however, at least an insertion lossof the optical waveguide can be measured. The insertion loss ispreferably smaller than the right side of the aforementioned Expression(14) or Expression (15). R_(b) is preferably a smaller radius ofcurvature, such as not more than 7 mm, not more than 6 mm, not more than5 mm, not more than 4 mm, not more than 3 mm, not more than 2 mm, andnot more than 1 mm. As considering a desire bend supplementary angle be90°, similar to the case of the optical fibers of the present invention,XT_(b, max90deg) is preferably at least not more than 10⁻³, morepreferably not more than 10⁻⁴, and still more preferably not more than10⁻⁵.

For allowing use of an ultraviolet curable adhesive in bonding theforegoing optical waveguide 18 to the SPC 14 and the optical fiber 20 asshown in FIG. 2, the optical waveguide 18 preferably transmitsultraviolet light 10% or more. The optical waveguide 18 preferably hasthe crosstalk of not more than −20 dB (0.01) while having the bentportion C3 in the extremely small radius of curvature (not more than 10mm).

In view of application using each two cores as a pair and performingsignal transmissions in mutually opposite directions through therespective cores, the number of cores in the optical fibers and opticalwaveguides of the present invention is preferably an even number.Furthermore, in view of improvement in core density (the number of coresper cross-sectional area), the number of cores is preferably four ormore, and the cores are preferably arranged on a hexagonal lattice. Inview of splitting of light from one common light source into beams toall the cores, the number of cores is preferably a power of 2.Furthermore, in view of coupling to a light input/output circuit of theSPC, the cores are preferably arranged on a rectangular lattice. Forbalancing the core density and the coupling to the SPC, the cores arepreferably arranged at equal intervals on an identical circle.

The aforementioned optical waveguide preferably has the insertion lossof higher-order spatial modes than the predetermined spatial mode beingat least 19.3 dB larger than the insertion loss of the predeterminedspatial mode.

The mode field diameter of the fundamental made of the cores at apredetermined wavelength is preferably in the range of 5.6 μm to 15.7 μmand more preferably not less than 7.9 μm. Then, the predeterminedwavelength is preferably any one wavelength in the range of 1.26 μm to1.625 μm.

The core-periphery structure in the optical fibers and opticalwaveguides according to the present embodiments is preferably thematched-cladding type in which the cladding having the given refractiveindex is provided around the core and more preferably thetrench-assisted type in which the trench layer having a lower refractiveindex than the cladding in the cladding portion around the core. In thecase of the trench-assisted type, an inside cladding layer having arefractive index lower than that of the cores and higher than that ofthe trench layer may be provided between the trench layer and the core.

A core 190 in the optical fibers and optical waveguides according to thepresent embodiments is preferably one provided, as shown in FIG. 18,with plural core-forming cores (sub-cores) 191 of an identicalcore-structure having a higher refractive index than a cladding 193 anda cladding (sub-cladding) 192 constituting the core 190 and having alower refractive index than the sub-cores 191, and the number of spatialmodes of the core 190 is preferably at least not less than the number ofthe sub-cores 191. Adjacent sub-cores 191 may be in contact or in nocontact with each other. The refractive index of the sub-cladding 192may be equal or unequal to that of the cladding 193. In the opticalfiber herein, crosstalk between adjacent sub-cores 191 is preferably notless than −10 dB inside the core 190 and a difference of average powersof light between all the sub-cores in the same core on the exit sidewith injection of light into only one sub-core is more preferably within1 dB. In the optical waveguide, the crosstalk between sub-cores ispreferably at least 10 dB larger than the crosstalk between cores andmore preferably at least 20 dB.

The bending loss in this specification is a decrease of intensity oflight in a core due to leakage of light propagating in the core, intothe cladding, but in general, when measurement of the bending loss ofoptical fiber is carried out with the fiber being bent in a given radiusof curvature, the light leaking once from the core into the cladding isreflected at the interface between the cladding and the coating and atthe interface between the coating and air to return to the core to bere-coupled thereto and the re-coupled light causes interference with thelight propagating in the core while not leaking into the cladding,whereby the bending loss actually observed can become larger and smallerthan the intrinsic bending loss of the core itself values fluctuateagainst wavelength change). Therefore, the bending loss is preferablydetermined as follows: a wavelength dependence of bending loss ismeasured in an actual fiber, fitting with an exponential curve is madefor the wavelength dependence of bending loss, and a value at apredetermined wavelength of the exponential curve is used as a bendingloss at the predetermined wavelength, which is used as the bending lossin the present invention excluding influence of the interference.Another preferred method is as follows: the fitting is performed with astraight line for the wavelength dependence of the logarithm of thebending loss, a value at a predetermined wavelength of the straight lineis obtained as the logarithm of the bending loss, and the bending lossis calculated from it, which is used as the bending loss in the presentinvention excluding influence of the interference.

When the cladding of the optical fiber is made of silica glass, a bendof the optical fiber in an extremely small radius of curvature poses aproblem that a probability of failure of the optical fiber becomes high.FIG. 19 shows radius-of-curvature dependences of cumulative failureprobability of optical fibers after 10 years with a bend of two 90°curves (i.e., a half turn), at several levels of cladding diameters.Specifically, each of graphs G1910 to 1960 shows a radius-of-curvaturedependency of the optical fiber with each cladding diameter, and thecladding diameter of each graph is 125 μm in graph G1910, 150 μm ingraph G1920, 175 μm in graph G1930. 200 μm in graph G1940, 225 μm ingraph G1950, and 250 μm in graph G1960. In the one-core fiber with theordinary cladding diameter of 125 μm, the cumulative failure probabilitysuddenly worsens at the radii of curvature of not more than 4 mm. In theoptical fiber, as the number of cores in the cladding increases, thecladding diameter tends to be larger than 125 μm. Since the claddingdiameter increases in association with increase of the number of cores,the radius of curvature is need to be increase in order to reduce afailure probability. The radius of curvature that the cladding diameterand the cumulative failure probability suddenly worsens, is not morethan 5 mm when the cladding diameter is 150 μm, not more than 6 mm whenthe cladding diameter is 175 μm, not more than 7 mm when the claddingdiameter is 200 μm, not more than 8 mm when the cladding diameter is 225μm, and not more than 9 mm when the cladding diameter is 250 μm. Theoptical fiber breaks with a bend because of stress applied to glass bythe bend. Here, by carrying out a thermal treatment during a bendingoperation of the optical fiber to relieve the stress-generated straindue to the bend, the optical fiber becomes less likely to break even ifthe optical fiber is bent in an extremely small radius of curvature.FIG. 19 shows graphs in a state that such a thermal treatment is notcarried out. In the case of the optical fiber given with the thermaltreatment, since it can be assumed that the bending stress is relievedunder a minimal bending, a problem concerning fracture lifetime probablydecrease.

In view of the above, when the optical fiber is considered to be used inthe transmission system shown in FIG. 1A, the optical fiber of thepresent invention is the optical fiber having the bent portion with abend of not less than 58°. In the bent portion thereof, thestress-generated strain caused inside the fiber by the bend is relievedby the thermal treatment. Even without external stress, the bent portionis preferably bent in the range of not less than 58° while thepredetermined radius of curvature R_(b) is set at a small radius of notmore than 10 mm, and the problem concerning failure probability is lowin even such a state. The bend angle is not limited to the above values,and the lower limit of bend angle permits the both cases of not lessthan 74° and not less than 84°. The foregoing bend angle is, preferablythe right angle, but in the light of suppressing the reflected light atthe end surface entering a core again, it is preferably the acute angleof not less than 74° and more preferably 81° to 83°.

Specific configurations of the optical fibers according to theaforementioned second embodiment will be described below.

(1) As a first configuration, an optical fiber according to the secondembodiment is an optical fiber in which plural cores of an identicalcore-structure are covered by a cladding having a lower refractive indexthan the cores,

wherein when D [μm] represents a minimum value of center-center distancebetween adjacent cores,

the minimum value D is a value in the range of 15 μm to 60 μm,

a crosstalk XT_(w/oB) to a predetermined core from other cores at apredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having no bend in aradius of curvature of less than 30 mm is not more than −20 dB (0.01),and

a crosstalk to the predetermined core from other cores at thepredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having a 90° bend in apredetermined radius of curvature R_(b) [mm] not more than 7 mm is notmore than twice XT_(w/oB).

(2) As a second configuration applicable to the first configuration, theoptical fiber has a trench layer with a relative refractive-indexdifference of not more than −01%. with respect to the cladding, betweenthe cores and the cladding.

(3) As a third configuration, an optical fiber according to the secondembodiment is an optical fiber in which plural cores of an identicalcore-structure are covered by a cladding having a lower refractive indexthan the cores,

the optical fiber having no layer with a relative refractive-indexdifference of not more than −0.1% with respect to the cladding, betweenthe cores and the cladding,

wherein when D [μm] represents a minimum value of center-center distancebetween adjacent cores and π the ratio of the circumference of a circleto its diameter,

the minimum value D is a value in the range of 15 μm to 60 μm,

a crosstalk XT_(w/oB) to a predetermined core from other cores at apredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having no bend in aradius of curvature of less than 30 mm is not more than −20 dB (0.01),

a bending loss per 90° α_(90deg) of the predetermined core at thepredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having a 90° bend in apredetermined radius of curvature R_(b) [mm] not more than 7 mm is notmore than a value represented by Expression (24) below:

$\begin{matrix}{{\sqrt{D^{3}\frac{{XT}_{w/{oB}}}{0.20}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{b}}\mspace{56mu}\left\lbrack {{dB}\text{/}90{^\circ}} \right\rbrack},} & (24)\end{matrix}$and

a difference of the bending loss α_(90deg) between the plural cores ofthe identical core-structure is not more than 1 dB.

(4) As a fourth configuration, an optical fiber according to the secondembodiment is an optical fiber in which plural cores of an identicalcore-structure are covered by a cladding having a lower refractive indexthan the cores,

the optical fiber having a trench layer with a relative refractive-indexdifference of not more than −0.1% with respect to the cladding, betweenthe cores and the cladding,

wherein when D [μm] represents a minimum value of center-center distancebetween adjacent cores and π the ratio of the circumference of a circleto its diameter,

the minimum value D is a value in the range of 15 μm to 60 μm,

a crosstalk XT_(w/oB) to a predetermined core from other cores at apredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having no bend in aradius of curvature of less than 30 mm is not more than −20 dB (0.01),

a bending loss per 90° α_(90deg) of the predetermined core at thepredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having a 90° bend in apredetermined radius of curvature R_(b) [mm] not more than 7 mm is notmore than a value represented by Expression (25) below:

$\begin{matrix}{{\sqrt{D^{3}\frac{{XT}_{w/{oB}}}{0.059}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{b}}\mspace{56mu}\left\lbrack {{dB}\text{/}90{^\circ}} \right\rbrack},} & (25)\end{matrix}$and

a difference of the bending loss α_(90deg) between the plural cores ofthe identical core-structure is not more than 1 dB.

(5) As a fifth configuration applicable to the second or fourthconfiguration, the optical fiber has an inside cladding layer having arefractive index lower than that of the cores and higher than that ofthe trench layer, between the cores and the trench layer.

(6) As a sixth configuration applicable to at least any one of the firstto fifth configurations, a fiber length of the optical fiber is not morethan 10 km.

(7) As a seventh configuration, an optical fiber according to the secondembodiment is an optical fiber in which plural cores of an identicalcore-structure are covered by a cladding having a lower refractive indexthan the cores,

the optical fiber having no layer with a relative refractive-indexdifference of not more than −0.1% with respect to the cladding, betweenthe cores and the cladding,

wherein when D [μm] represents a minimum value of center-center distancebetween adjacent cores and π the ratio of the circumference of a circleto its diameter,

the minimum value D is a value in the range of 15 μm to 60 μm,

a crosstalk XT_(w/oB) to a predetermined core from other cores at apredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having no bend in aradius of curvature of less than 30 mm is not more than −20 dB (0.01),

a bending loss per 90° α_(90deg) of the predetermined core at thepredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having a 90° bend in apredetermined radius of curvature R_(b) [mm] not more than the radius ofcurvature of 7 mm is not more than a value represented by Expression(26) below:

$\begin{matrix}{{\sqrt{D^{3}\frac{10^{- 3}}{0.20}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{b}}\mspace{56mu}\left\lbrack {{dB}\text{/}90{^\circ}} \right\rbrack},} & (26)\end{matrix}$and

a difference of the bending loss α_(90deg) between the plural cores ofthe identical core-structure is not more than 1 dB.

(8) As an eighth configuration, an optical fiber according to the secondembodiment is an optical fiber in which plural cores of an identicalcore structure are covered by a cladding having a lower refractive indexthan the cores,

the optical fiber having a trench layer with a relative refractive-indexdifference of not more than −0.1% with respect to the cladding, betweenthe cores and the cladding,

wherein when D [μm] represents a minimum value of center-center distancebetween adjacent cores and π the ratio of the circumference of a circleto its diameter,

the minimum value D is a value in the range of 15 μm to 60 μm,

a crosstalk XT_(w/oB) to a predetermined core from other cores at apredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having no bend in aradius of curvature of less than 30 mm is not more than −20 dB (0.01),

a bending loss per 90° α_(90deg) of the predetermined core at thepredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having a 90° bend in apredetermined radius of curvature R_(b) [mm] not more than 4 mm is notmore than a value represented by Expression (27) below:

$\begin{matrix}{{\sqrt{D^{3}\frac{10^{- 3}}{0.059}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{b}}\mspace{56mu}\left\lbrack {{dB}\text{/}90{^\circ}} \right\rbrack},} & (27)\end{matrix}$and

a difference of the bending loss α_(90deg) between the plural cores ofthe identical core-structure is not more than 1 dB.

(9) As a ninth configuration applicable to the eighth configuration, theoptical fiber has an inside cladding layer having a refractive indexlower than that of the cores and higher than that of the trench layer,between the cores and the trench layer.

(10) As a tenth configuration applicable to at least any one of thefirst to ninth configurations, a loss in the radius of curvature R_(b)of higher-order spatial modes than a predetermined spatial mode of thecores is at least 19.3 dB per 90° larger than a loss in the radius ofcurvature R_(b) of the predetermined spatial mode.

(11) As an eleventh configuration applicable to at least any one of thefirst to ninth configurations, a loss in the radius of curvature of 140mm of higher-order spatial modes than a predetermined spatial mode ofthe cores is not less than 1 dB/m, and

a loss in the radius of curvature of 140 mm of the predetermined spatialmode is not more than 0.1 dB/m.

(12) As a twelfth configuration applicable to the tenth configuration orthe eleventh configuration, the predetermined spatial mode is ahigher-order spatial mode other than a fundamental mode.

(13) As a thirteenth configuration applicable to at least any one of thefirst to twelfth configurations, the core comprises plural sub-coreshaving a higher refractive index than the cladding and a sub-claddinghaving a lower refractive index than the sub-cores,

the plural sub-cores all have an identical core-structure,

the number of spatial modes of the core is at least not less than thenumber of the sub-cores, and

a crosstalk between the sub-cores adjacent to each other inside the coreis not less than −10 dB.

(14) As a fourteenth configuration applicable to at least any one of thefirst to eleventh configurations, the predetermined spatial mode is afundamental mode, and

a mode field diameter of the predetermined spatial mode at thepredetermined wavelength is in the range of 5.6 μm to 15.7 μm.

(15) As a fifteenth configuration applicable to at least any one of thefirst to fourteenth configurations, the predetermined wavelength is anyone wavelength in the range of 1.26 μm to 1.625 μm.

(16) As a sixteenth configuration applicable to the fourteenthconfiguration, the predetermined wavelength is 1.31 μm, and

a cable cutoff wavelength of the core is not more than 1.29 μm.

(17) As a seventeenth configuration applicable to the fourteenthconfiguration, the predetermined wavelength is 1.49 μm, and

a cable cutoff wavelength of the core is not more than 1.46 μm.

(18) As an eighteenth configuration applicable to the fourteenthconfiguration, the predetermined wavelength is 1.55 μm, and

a cable cutoff wavelength of the core is not more than 1.53 μm.

(19) As a nineteenth configuration, an optical fiber according to thesecond embodiment is an optical fiber in which plural cores of anidentical core-structure are covered by a cladding having a lowerrefractive index than the cores and the cladding is covered by anintegral coating,

the optical fiber having a trench layer with a relative refractive-indexdifference of not more than −0.1% with respect to the cladding, betweenthe cores and the cladding,

wherein when D [μm] represents a minimum value of center-center distancebetween adjacent cores and π the ratio of the circumference of a circleto its diameter,

the minimum value D is a value in the range of 15 μm to 60 μm,

a crosstalk between adjacent cores at the center-center distance D at apredetermined wavelength is not more than −20 dB (0.01),

a cable cutoff wavelength of the cores is not more than 1.29 μm,

a bending loss per 90° α_(90deg) of the predetermined core at thepredetermined wavelength with the optical fiber having a 90° bend in apredetermined radius of curvature R_(b) [mm] not more than 4 mm is notmore than a value represented by Expression (28) below:

$\begin{matrix}{{\sqrt{D^{3}\frac{10^{- 3}}{0.059}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{b}}\mspace{56mu}\left\lbrack {{dB}\text{/}90{^\circ}} \right\rbrack},} & (28)\end{matrix}$and

a difference of the bending loss α_(90deg) between the plural cores ofthe identical core-structure is not more than 1 dB.

(20) As a twentieth configuration applicable to the nineteenthconfiguration, the optical fiber has an inside cladding layer having arefractive index lower than that of the cores and higher than that ofthe trench layer, between the cores and the trench layer.

(21) As a twenty first configuration applicable to at least any one ofthe first to seventh and the tenth to twentieth configurations, thepredetermined radius of curvature R_(b) is not more than 5 mm.

(22) As a twenty second configuration applicable to at least any one ofthe first to twenty first configurations, the optical fiber is anoptical fiber having a bent portion with a bend of not less than 58°,

wherein stress caused inside the fiber by the bend is relieved in thebent portion, and

wherein the bent portion has the bend of not less than 58° in thepredetermined radius of curvature R_(b) as a minimum radius ofcurvature, even without external stress.

(23) A twenty third configuration relates to an optical fibertransmission system, the optical fiber transmission system comprising atransmitter, a receiver, and a transmission line, wherein thetransmission line comprises an optical fiber having at least any one ofthe first to twenty second configurations,

wherein each of the transmitter and the receiver comprises a waveguidechip capable of implementing input/output of light, and a housinginternally having the waveguide chip,

wherein the input/output of light into or out of the waveguide chip isimplemented at an angle in the range of 74° to 90° from a surface of thechip, and

wherein in the housing, the optical fiber is optically connected at anangle in the range of 74° to 90° to the waveguide chip with the opticalfiber having a bend in the radius of curvature R_(b) [mm].

(24) A twenty fourth configuration relates to an optical waveguide, theoptical waveguide being an optical waveguide in which plural cores of anidentical core-structure are covered by a cladding having a lowerrefractive index than the cores,

wherein each of the cores has a bent portion in a minimum radius ofcurvature of not more than 10 mm,

wherein a direction of a central axis of each core is bent in the rangeof 58° to 90° by the bent portion,

the optical waveguide having at least two planes capable of implementinginput/output of light into or out of each core, with the bent portion inbetween,

wherein a height of the optical waveguide with one of the planes beingdefined as a bottom surface is not more than 13 mm,

wherein a minimum value D [μm] of center-center distance betweenadjacent cores is a value in the range of 15 μm to 60 μm, and

wherein a crosstalk between adjacent cores at the center-to-centerdistance D at a predetermined wavelength is not more than −20 dB (0.01).

(25) As a twenty fifth configuration applicable to the twenty fourthconfiguration, the minimum radius of curvature of the cores is not morethan 7 mm, and

the height of the optical waveguide with one of the planes being definedas a bottom surface is not more than 10 mm.

(26) As a twenty fifth configuration applicable to the twenty fourthconfiguration, the minimum radius of curvature of the cores is not morethan 5 mm, and

the height of the optical waveguide with one of the planes being definedas a bottom surface is not more than 8 mm.

(27) As a twenty seventh configuration applicable to at least any one ofthe twenty fourth to twenty sixth configurations, no layer with arelative refractive-index difference of not more than −0.1% with respectto the cladding is provided between the cores and the cladding,

when R_(b) [mm] represent a minimum radius of curvature of the cores andπ the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter,

an insertion loss at the predetermined wavelength of the cores is notmore than a value represented by Expression (29) below:

$\begin{matrix}{{\sqrt{D^{3}\frac{10^{- 3}}{0.20}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{b}}\mspace{56mu}\left\lbrack {{dB}\text{/}90{^\circ}} \right\rbrack},} & (29)\end{matrix}$and

a difference of the insertion loss between the plural cores of theidentical core-structure is not more than 1 dB.

(28) As a twenty eighth configuration applicable to at least any one ofthe twenty fourth to twenty sixth configurations, the optical waveguidecomprises a trench layer with a relative refractive-index difference ofnot more than −0.1% with respect to the cladding, between the cores andthe cladding,

a direction of a central axis of each core is bent in the range of 76°to 90° by the bent portion,

when R_(b) [mm] represent a minimum radius of curvature of the cores andπ the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter,

an insertion loss at the predetermined wavelength of the cores is notmore than a value represented by Expression (30) below:

$\begin{matrix}{{\sqrt{D^{3}\frac{10^{- 3}}{0.059}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{b}}\mspace{56mu}\left\lbrack {{dB}\text{/}90{^\circ}} \right\rbrack},} & (30)\end{matrix}$and

a difference of the insertion loss between the plural cores of theidentical core-structure is not more than −1 dB.

(29) As a twenty ninth configuration applicable to the twenty eighthconfiguration, the optical waveguide has an inside cladding layer havinga refractive index lower than that of the cores and higher than that ofthe trench layer, between the cores and the trench layer.

(30) As a thirtieth configuration applicable to at least any one of thetwenty fourth to twenty ninth configurations, at the predeterminedwavelength,

an insertion loss of higher-order spatial modes than a predeterminedspatial mode is at least 19.3 dB larger than an insertion loss of thepredetermined spatial mode.

(31) As a thirty first configuration applicable to the thirtiethconfiguration, the predetermined spatial mode is a higher-order spatialmode other than a fundamental mode.

(32) As a thirty second configuration applicable to at least any one ofthe twenty fourth to thirty first configurations, the core comprisesplural sub-cores having a higher refractive index than the cladding anda sub-cladding having a lower refractive index than the sub-cores,

the plural sub-cores all have an identical core-structure,

the number of spatial modes of the core is at least not less than thenumber of the sub-cores, and

a crosstalk between the sub-cores adjacent to each other inside the coreis not less than −10 dB (0.1).

(33) As a thirty third configuration applicable to at least any one ofthe twenty fourth to thirty first configurations, a mode field diameterof a fundamental mode of the cores at the predetermined wavelength is inthe range of 5.6 μm to 15.7 μm.

(34) As a thirty fourth configuration applicable to at least any one ofthe twenty fourth to thirty third configurations, the predeterminedwavelength is any one wavelength in the range of 1.2.6 μm to 1.625 μm.

(35) A thirty fifth configuration relates to an optical fibertransmission system, the optical fiber transmission system comprising atransmitter, a receiver, and a transmission line,

wherein the transmission line comprises an optical fiber,

wherein each of the transmitter and the receiver comprises a waveguidechip with a function to implement input or output of signal light, and ahousing internally having the waveguide chip,

wherein the input/output of signal light into or out of the waveguidechip is implemented at an angle in the range of 74° to 90° from asurface of the chip, and

wherein in the housing, the optical fiber is optically connected to thewaveguide chip through the optical waveguide having any one of thetwenty fourth to thirty second configurations.

The present embodiment provides the optical fibers, optical waveguides,and optical fiber transmission systems in which the increase ofcrosstalk is suppressed even with a bend in a small radius of curvature.

What is claimed is:
 1. An optical waveguide comprising: plural coresincluding a pair of adjacent cores with an identical core-structure; acladding covering each of plural cores; a first surface on which oneends of the plural cores are disposed; and a second surface on which theother ends of the plural cores are disposed, the plural cores extendingfrom the first surface to the second surface, wherein a minimum value D[μm] of center-to-center distance between the adjacent cores is a valuein the range of 15 μm to 60 μm, and the optical waveguide satisfies thefollowing first condition or second condition at a predeterminedwavelength within the range of 1.26 μm to 1.625 μm, the first conditionbeing defined by: an optical fiber serving as the optical waveguide; adifference of α_(90deg) between cores having the identicalcore-structure, the difference being not more than 1 dB where theα_(90deg) is defined as a bending loss per 90° of a predetermined corewhile the optical fiber has a 90° bend in a predetermined radius ofcurvature R_(b) [mm] of not more than 4 mm; a linear value serving as avirtual crosstalk in a 10-km fiber length between the adjacent cores atthe center-to-center distance of the minimum value D, the linear valuebeing not more than 0.01 where the optical fiber has bend in apredetermined radius of curvature of 30 mm to 200 cm; and the bendingloss α_(90deg) of not more than a value represented by Expression (1)below where a linear value serving as a crosstalk in a predeterminedfiber length of not more than 10 km is XT_(w/oB) and the optical fiberhas bend in the predetermined radius of curvature of 30 mm to 200 cm,or, the bending loss α_(90deg) of not more than a value represented byExpression (2) below where a cladding portion around each of the pluralcores constitutes a trench-assisted type having a trench layer with arelative refractive-index difference of not more than −0.1% with respectto the cladding:0.809 exp(6.64×10⁻² D)√{square root over (XT_(w/oB)R_(b))}[dB/90°]  (1); and1.42 exp(7.78×10⁻² D)√{square root over (XT_(w/oB)R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (2),the second condition being defined by: Expression (3) below beingdefined as Expression (1) from which a definition concerning a fiberlength is removed in the first condition; and Expression (4) below beingdefined as Expression (2) from which the definition concerning the fiberlength is removed in the first condition:0.809 exp(6.64×10⁻² D)√{square root over (10⁻³ R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (3);and1.42 exp(7.78×10⁻² D)√{square root over (10⁻³ R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (4). 2.The optical waveguide according to claim 1, wherein the opticalwaveguide comprises an inside cladding layer between each of the pluralcores and the associated trench layer, the inside cladding having arefractive-index lower than that of each of the plural cores and higherthan that of the associated trench layer.
 3. The optical waveguideaccording to claim 1, wherein a spatial mode of each of the plural coresis a fundamental mode, and wherein a mode field diameter of the spatialmode at the predetermined wavelength falls within the range of 5.6 μm to15.7 μm.
 4. The optical waveguide according to claim 1, wherein each ofthe plural cores guides multiple special modes.
 5. The optical waveguideaccording to claim 1, wherein a cable cutoff wavelength of each of theplural cores is not more than 1.29 μm, not more than 1.46 μm, or notmore than 1.53 μm.
 6. The optical waveguide according to claim 1,wherein each of the plural cores has a cable cutoff wavelength of notmore than 1.29 μm, and a mode field diameter at a wavelength of 1.31 μmfalls within the range of 8.0 μm to 10.1 μm, and wherein at any onewavelength of 1.49 μm and 1.55 μm, the optical waveguide satisfies anyone condition of the following fourth to seventh conditions, the fourthcondition being defined by: the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 4mm being not more than 0.139 dB/90°; or the bending loss α_(90deg) inthe R_(b) of 4 mm being not more than 0.288 dB/90° where the trenchlayer with the relative refractive-index difference of not more than−0.1% with respect to the cladding is provided between each of theplural cores and the cladding, the fifth condition being defined by: thebending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 3 mm being not more than 0.120dB/90°; or the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 3 mm being notmore than 0.250 dB/90° where the trench layer with the relativerefractive-index difference of not more than −0.1% with respect to thecladding is provided between each of the plural cores and the cladding,the sixth condition being defined by: the bending loss α_(90deg) in theR_(b) of 2 mm being not more than 0.098 dB/90°; or the bending lossα_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 2 mm being not more than 0.204 dB/90° wherethe trench layer with the relative refractive-index difference of notmore than −0.1% with respect to the cladding is provided between each ofthe plural cores and the cladding, the seventh condition being definedby: the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 1 mm being not more than0.069 dB/90°; or the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 1 mm beingnot more than 0.144 dB/90° where the trench layer with the relativerefractive-index difference of not more than −0.1% with respect to thecladding is provided between each of the plural cores and the cladding.7. The optical waveguide according to claim 1, wherein a cable cutoffwavelength of each of the plural cores is not more than 1.26 μm, whereina mode field diameter at a wavelength of 1.31 μm falls within the rangeof 8.0 μm to 10.1 μm, wherein at a wavelength of 1.49 μm, a bending lossα_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 4 mm is not more than 0.139 dB/90°, andwherein the trench layer with the relative refractive-index differenceof not more than −0.2% with respect to the cladding is provided betweeneach of the plural cores and the cladding, and at the wavelength of 1.49μm, the bending loss α_(90deg) in the R_(b) of 4 mm is not more than0.288 dB/90° where a relative refractive-index of each of the pluralcores with respect to the cladding falls within the range of 0.24% to0.35%.
 8. The optical waveguide according to claim 1, wherein theoptical waveguide includes an optical fiber, wherein the opticalwaveguide has the bent portion bent so that the bend supplementary anglefalls within the range of 58° to 90°, wherein in the bent portion,stress-generated strain caused inside the optical fiber by bending isrelieved by a heat treatment processing, and wherein the bent portion isbent with the supplementary angle while the R_(b) is maintained evenwithout external stress.
 9. An optical waveguide comprising: pluralcores including a pair of adjacent cores with an identicalcore-structure; a cladding covering each of plural cores; a firstsurface on which one ends of the plural cores are disposed; and a secondsurface on which the other ends of the plural cores are disposed, theplural cores extending from the first surface to the second surface,wherein a minimum value D [μm]of center-to-center distance between theadjacent cores is a value in the range of 15 μm to 60 μm, and theoptical waveguide satisfies the following third condition at apredetermined wavelength within the range of 1.26 μm to 1.625 μm, thethird condition being defined by: a bent portion of each of the pluralcores, the bent portion being fixed in the radius of curvature R_(b) ofnot more than 7 mm; a crosstalk between the adjacent cores at the Dserving as an adjacent core distance, the crosstalk being not more than0.01; a bend supplementary angle falling within the range of 58° to 90°,the bend supplementary angle corresponding to a supplementary angle toan angle at a bending center side out of angles defined by straightportions sandwiching the bent portion in each of the plural cores; aplane serving as each of the first surface and the second surface, theplane enabling light entrance and light emission to each of the pluralcores; and a height of the optical waveguide with one of the firstsurface and the second surface being defined as a bottom surface, theheight being not more than 10 mm.
 10. The optical waveguide according toclaim 9, wherein where the height of the optical waveguide is defined asa lower height of the optical waveguide in the other surface whiledefining one of the first surface and the second surface as a bottomsurface, the optical waveguide has either one of a first structure or asecond structure, the first structure being defined by the R_(b) of eachof the plural cores of not more than 5 mm and the height of not morethan 8 mm, the second structure being defined by the R_(b) of each ofthe plural cores of not more than 3 mm and the height of not more than 6mm.
 11. The optical waveguide according to claim 9, wherein a differenceof insertion loss between the plural cores is not more than 1 dB at thepredetermined wavelength, wherein the insertion loss is not more than avalue represented by Expression (5) below, or, the insertion loss is notmore than a value represented by Expression (6) below where the claddingportion around each of the plural cores constitutes the trench-assistedtype having the trench layer with the relative refractive-indexdifference of not more than −0.1% with respect to the cladding:0.809 exp(6.64×10⁻² D)√{square root over (10⁻³ R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (5);and1.42 exp(7.78×10⁻² D)√{square root over (10⁻³ R_(b))} [dB/90°]  (6). 12.The optical waveguide according to claim 11, wherein the opticalwaveguide comprises an inside cladding layer between each of the pluralcores and the associated trench layer, the inside cladding having arefractive-index lower than that of each of the plural cores and higherthan that of the associated trench layer.
 13. The optical waveguideaccording to claim 9, wherein a mode field diameter of a fundamentalmode in each of the plural cores falls within the range of 5.6 μm to15.7 μm.
 14. An optical fiber transmission system comprising atransmitter, a receiver, and an optical fiber as the optical waveguideaccording to claim 9, wherein each of the transmitter and the receivercomprises a waveguide chip capable of implementing input/output oflight, and a housing internally having the waveguide chip, wherein eachof the transmitter and the receiver is optically connected to theoptical fiber so that a surface of the waveguide chip and the opticalfiber take the form of an acute angle in the range of 74° to 90°, andwherein in the housing, the optical fiber is provided with a bent of theR_(b).
 15. The optical waveguide according to claim 9, wherein theoptical waveguide includes an optical fiber, wherein in the bentportion, stress-generated strain caused inside the optical fiber bybending is relieved by a heat treatment processing, and wherein the bentportion is bent with the supplementary angle while the R_(b) ismaintained even without external stress.
 16. The optical waveguideaccording to claim 9, wherein no layer with the relativerefractive-index difference of not more than −0.1% with respect to thecladding is provided between the cores and the cladding, an insertionloss at the predetermined wavelength of the cores is not more than avalue represented by Expression (7) below: $\begin{matrix}{{\sqrt{D^{3}\frac{10^{- 3}}{0.20}\frac{\pi}{2}10^{- 3}R_{d}}\mspace{14mu}\lbrack{dB}\rbrack},} & (7)\end{matrix}$  and a difference of the insertion loss between the pluralcores of the identical core-structure is not more than 1 dB.